A causative situation is a complex one consisting of a base situation Sd comprising a core Vd and a participant NU – the causee – and of a superordinate causing situation Sh comprising a participant NA – the causer. The core of Sh is the predicate cause, with NA as the actor and Sd – and mediately NU – as the undergoer. Causation comprises, as a variant, the notion of permission. If the causation is exerted by communication, its predicate is a directive predicate.

A causative construction is one which expands Sd by Sh. At the pole of maximal explicitness, Sh is a full clause, with the cause predicate being represented by a verb of causing, doing or letting, and its combination with Sd is a complex clause. At the pole of maximal condensation, NA is a component of Sd and cause is a grammatical formative or is even lexically merged with V.

In , #a represents Sd; 'weed' is Vd; Irvin is NU; Linda is NA. cause is coded by made in #b and by had in #c. The causative construction in #b and #c is biclausal, with Sd being non-finite.

.a.Irvin weeded the bed.
b.Linda made Irvin weed the bed.
c.Linda had Irvin weed the bed.

In , cause is a grammatical formative, viz. the suffix -sase. The causative construction in #b is monoclausal.

.a.Hanako=gakuruma=karaori-ru.
JapHanako=NOMcar=ABLget.out-PRS
Hanako gets out of the car.
 b.Taroo=gaHanako=okuruma=karaori-sase-ru
Taro=NOMHanako=ACCcar=ABLget.out-CAUS-PRS
Taro has Hanako get out of the car.

The verb of b bears a semantically causative relation to the verb of #a. The morphological relation, viz. the causative derivation, is no longer regular (as it is in ).

.a.Linda’s eyebrows rose.
b.Linda raised her eyebrows.

More detailed information on causative constructions.