A participant-oriented postposition does not assign (like an event-oriented postposition) an oblique role to its complement vis-à-vis the superordinate verb.
Instead, its complement bears a predicative relation to some actant of the main predicate and shares its semantic role.
Consequently, a participant-oriented postpositional phrase may constitute the predicate complement in a copula clause.
In a verbal clause, it functions like a secondary predicate on the actant in question.
Equiparative postpositions
The syntagmatic relation coded by an equiparative postposition between N and its antecedent is, at the same time, a paradigmatic relation, viz. one of similarity.
Table 5: Equiparative postpositions
form |
label |
meaning |
kä́i/(ka~gi)pí ~ bí |
Equal |
as, like N |
sú̱ta |
Similative1 |
like N, similar to N (in appearance) |
së́ta |
Similative2 |
like N, similar to N (in sound, taste or smell) |
yë́ |
Translative |
in(to) the form of N,
as N |
E5 |
Yökö́ |
bukalë́i |
te |
sá |
tk-á=wa̱ |
ra, |
sá |
dälä́-w-é̱ |
yökö́ |
kä́i. |
|
[fire |
wasp:spc |
erg |
1.pl |
cross-pfv=tot] |
tmp |
1.pl |
burn-caus-ipfv |
fire |
equ |
|
‘If the fire wasp stung (us), it burns (us) like fire.’ |
E6 |
yís |
sú̱ta |
|
1.sg |
sim |
|
‘like me’ |
E7 |
jé |
rä |
ko̱ñó̱ |
yë́ |
|
d.med |
cop |
rat |
trl |
|
‘that one was transformed into a rat’ |