A causative situation is a complex one consisting of a base situation Sd comprising a core Vd and a participant NU – the causee – and of a superordinate causing situation Sh comprising a participant NA – the causer. The core of Sh is the predicate cause, with NA as the actor and Sd – and mediately NU – as the undergoer. Causation comprises, as a variant, the notion of permission. If the causation is exerted by communication, its predicate is a directive predicate.
A causative construction is one which expands Sd by Sh. At the pole of maximal explicitness, Sh is a full clause, with the cause predicate being represented by a verb of causing, doing or letting, and its combination with Sd is a complex clause. At the pole of maximal condensation, NA is a component of Sd and cause is a grammatical formative or is even lexically merged with V.
In , #a represents Sd; 'weed' is Vd; Irvin is NU; Linda is NA. cause is coded by made in #b and by had in #c. The causative construction in #b and #c is biclausal, with Sd being non-finite.
. | a. | Irvin weeded the bed. |
b. | Linda made Irvin weed the bed. | |
c. | Linda had Irvin weed the bed. |
In , cause is a grammatical formative, viz. the suffix -sase. The causative construction in #b is monoclausal.
. | a. | Hanako=ga | kuruma=kara | ori-ru. |
Jap | Hanako=NOM | car=ABL | get.out-PRS | |
Hanako gets out of the car. |
b. | Taroo=ga | Hanako=o | kuruma=kara | ori-sase-ru | |
Taro=NOM | Hanako=ACC | car=ABL | get.out-CAUS-PRS | ||
Taro has Hanako get out of the car. |
The verb of b bears a semantically causative relation to the verb of #a. The morphological relation, viz. the causative derivation, is no longer regular (as it is in ).
. | a. | Linda’s eyebrows rose. |
b. | Linda raised her eyebrows. |